I think this sounds like an interesting approach to ultimately providing better performance to the end user. Yet with the cost of bandwidth decreasing and products like Riverbed's Steelhead solution accelerating applications, I am curious to see how this will play out.
Charles Beck
Tredent Data Systems, Inc.
WAN Optimization
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary 
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info [589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos] [407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"? [1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games [682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow] [578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX [1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow] [409]
|
|
Juniper already does most of this
Juniper already does most of this on a single hardware platform. So do some of Packeteer's other competitors. Here is another Packeteer box to add to their already out of date multi-box solution. They haven't competed in Network World's last two annual accelerator contests because they know they can't compete.
Are you on Riverbed's payroll?
Everywhere I go, I see Justin plugging Riverbed, even if the article doesn't mention them. It's like clockword. If the article mentions WAN optimization, or Cisco in some way, Justin has a comment, and finds some way to throw Riverbed and "I have all the best comparison data" in there.
Post new comment