This is a very interesting case for many reasons. Any time legal status is altered from one category to another is significant. Here, changing from licensed Intellectual Property to mere copyright is quite a change . Given the impact on the industry, it would be interesting to hear the specific facts and arguments that led the judge to his conclusion.
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary 
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info [589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos] [407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"? [1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games [682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow] [578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX [1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow] [409]
|
|
"Like a book..."
The ruling sounds a bit like Borlands "No-Nonsense" license language from the late 80's.
Post new comment