I am seeing ForeScout everywhere. It seems like they are coming out with new features every month, but my team is still trying to deploy Cisco NAC which hasn't changed in two years.
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary 
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info [589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos] [407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"? [1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games [682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow] [578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX [1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow] [409]
|
|
Cisco NAC is very hard to install, unless you have 802...
Cisco NAC is very hard to install, unless you have 802.1x switches it requires a client to be installed. This is a pain and costs me $30 each in labor costs. Also as clients don't run on things like printers the exceptions do not make it secure enough. For now I do not like the Cisco NAC, better to go with one of the clientless, not inline vendors like ForeScout.
Post new comment