The packet inspection is not just obscene...it is illegal according to various Federal laws on privacy. Sadly for the USA, we have an Emperor whose word is law and do not enforce most laws on the books, especially those related to Antitrust.
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary 
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info [589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos] [407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"? [1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games [682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow] [578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX [1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow] [409]
|
|
Quinn is an AT&T flunkie!
Quinn added. "The money to build them just doesn't exist.
1) Do remember before 2001 when we had to much bandwith due to fiber over building.
2) Do know about DWDM and it's ability to make a fiber have almost limitless bandwidth and the cost is in the labor of laying the lines not the boxes at the end.
I agree they need to manage their bandwidth but packet inspection and tracking stats are an invasion of privacy.
We are a Capitalist Economy if the new AT&T can't do it they will loose money and some other company will buy them and do it. Just like Cingular did to the old AT&T.
Post new comment