Tim must be talking about other NAC solutions that Sophos solutions just don't experience.
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary 
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info [589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos] [407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"? [1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games [682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow] [578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX [1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow] [409]
|
|
Pre-connect vs. post-connect NAC
This is a similar situation to the IDS vs IPS debate. In an IDS world, a false positive is an annoyance; more noise to deal with at the admin level. When you move to IPS however, a false positive becomes a denial of service issue. The same distinction exists between pre-connect and post-connect NAC. A false positive in pre-connect NAC denies the user network access; in a post connect scenario you have the option of less drastic actions.
Post new comment