Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

IBM flash memory breaks 1 million IOPS barrier

IBM claims to shatter record for fastest storage
By Jon Brodkin , Network World , 08/28/2008
  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print

IBM has claimed a major breakthrough in flash storage, with a research project that's delivering data transfer speeds of more than 1 million input/output operations per second, two and a half times faster than the industry's fastest disk storage. 

IBM's Project Quicksilver, announced Thursday, combines solid-state flash memory with IBM's storage virtualization technology. "Quicksilver improved performance by 250% at less than 1/20th the response time, took up 1/5th the floor space and required only 55% of the power and cooling," IBM says.

IBM said Quicksilver is two and a half times faster than its own SAN Volume Controller coupled with IBM's DS4700 storage. It would also be two and a half times faster than technology from Texas Memory Systems, which says it has the world's fastest storage with an IOPS rate of 400,000.

Flash storage is starting to catch on with enterprise customers as such vendors as EMC promise faster speeds and more efficient use of storage with solid-state disks. Speeds are typically orders-of-magnitude lower than what IBM is claiming to have achieved. Sun, for example, says it plans to sell 32GB flash drives that deliver about 5,000 or more write-IOPS and at least 30,000 read-IOPS. 

IBM said it has been selling solid-state drives in some BladeCenter servers since June 2007, but didn't say when Project Quicksilver might result in a marketable product. (Compare storage products.)

Quicksilver is a collaboration between engineers and researchers at the IBM Hursley development laboratory in England and IBM's Almaden Research Center in California.

"Performance improvements of this magnitude can have profound implications for business, allowing two to three times the work to [be completed] in a given time frame for . . . time-sensitive applications like reservations systems, and financial program trading systems, and creating opportunity for entirely new insights in information-warehouses and analytics solutions," IBM states in a press release.

Despite its potential to improve data transfer speeds, IBM said Project Quicksilver's flash technology is not about to replace today's hard disk drives. Instead, it will be part of a "complete, end-to-end systems approach" to storage.

  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print
Partner Content

SMART Steps Toward Consolidated Workload Automation

Consolidating job scheduling into a single, comprehensive workload automation solution is a critical first step to effective workload automation (WLA).

White paper on WLA here


A Comprehensive Approach to Practicing ITIL Change Management

Read a compelling whitepaper by EMA, Inc. to learn best practices for integrating workload automation.

Whitepaper here

2 Minutes to IT workload automation

BMC CONTROL-M can put money back into your IT budget and strip the complexity and risk from workload automation.

View video here

Gain a faster, cheaper way to manage workload

BMC CONTROL-M can help you migrate to a workload automation solution to meet your organization’s goals.

Listen here for more info

Comments (10)
Login
Forgot your account info?

how to create a project using flash memoryBy Anonymous on September 11, 2008, 3:44 pmhelp us! can anyone tell us where we can find the

Reply | Read entire comment

raw speedBy Anonymous on September 10, 2008, 2:06 pmThe raw speed is there - 600 MB/s writes and 700 MB/s reads ( 4k blocks sustained ). I played with an IOdrive on a linux box. Read a 4.7 GB ISO image in under...

Reply | Read entire comment

A little perspective, pleaseBy thestorageanarchist on September 5, 2008, 11:34 amFor a bit more balancing perspective, including additional admissions from the guys who ran the tests, check out my blog and the comments on this post: http://thestorageanarchist.typepad.com/weblog/2008/09/1023-its-just-a.html

Reply | Read entire comment

it would obviously run raid. duhBy Anonymous on September 2, 2008, 11:22 amit would obviously run raid. probably raid 10

Reply | Read entire comment

ParallelBy Anonymous on August 29, 2008, 7:38 pmMy guess is that they're getting the speeds via parallel access. It would be a lot like RAID striping.

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed