Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

Windows Server 2008: Faster, more manageable and secure, but still missing the virtual link

By Tom Henderson and Rand Dvorak, Network World Lab Alliance , Network World , 02/21/2008

Microsoft's long-awaited Windows Server 2008 delivers advancements in speed, security and management, but its virtualization and network-access control features come up short.

In our testing of Windows Server 2008 gold code – the product officially launches on Wednesday – we found that Microsoft has made a number of improvements to its flagship server operating system.

For example, new server administrative role schemes boost security, the Server Manager program improves manageability, Internet Information Server (IIS) Web management functionality is revamped, Active Directory is easier to control, and Windows Terminal Services has been redesigned. Windows Server 2008 is also significantly faster than Windows Server 2003, especially when client machines are running Vista.


5 things we love about Windows 2008 Server
5 things we hate about Windows 2008 Server
How we tested Windows 2008 Server
Archive of Network World tests
Subscribe to the Network Product Test Results newsletter

Unfortunately, a highly anticipated feature of Windows Server 2008, the Hyper-V server virtualization tool, is missing. Microsoft includes a beta version of Hyper-V with Windows Server 2008 editions, but it will not release final code until the third quarter of this year.

Also missing is compatibility between non-Windows (and older Windows) clients and Microsoft's Network Access Protection (NAP) scheme, Microsoft's version of NAC.

The Microsoft NAP scheme uses client-side 'health certificates' to either give or deny clients access to the network An 'unhealthy' client is vectored to remediation servers for necessary antivirus updates or security patches (compare NAC products.).

We tested the NAP scheme as implemented in Windows Server 2008 and found that it works as long as the client is running Windows XP or Vista. (See sidebar.) But it won't let clients running any other brand of operating system have access to its protected resources, thus hampering the potential success of the NAP scheme, because all client types must be vetted for NAC to work effectively.

Rethinking server roles

Microsoft wants administrators of Windows Server 2008 editions (it will ship in the usual flavors of Standard, Enterprise, Data Center and Itanium-specific code) to think of the server as playing certain roles. Server roles are aggregated objects that suit commonly thought-of services, such as print services, file sharing, DNS, DHCP, Active Directory Domain Controller and IIS-based Web services. Microsoft has defined 18 roles in all.

Partner Content
CA logo

CA Network & Voice Resource Center

Comprehensive Network & Voice Management Visit CA Network & Voice Management Resource Center and get insights into industry best practices, information that helps you to address your challenges.

CA Network & Voice Management Resource Center

whitepaper

Managing Voice Over IP for Successful Convergence

Voice over IP (VoIP) has much to offer in cost savings but some customers have concerns about VoIP call quality compared to the quality of traditional voice services. This white paper will help you learn how to take the right steps so that voice quality is assured.

Managing VoIP for Successful Convergence

whitepaper

The Changing Face of Network Management

Managing your network is serious business. This paper discusses the benefits of integrating configuration change-awareness into your network fault management solution

Download Whitepaper

Comments (12)
Login
Forgot your account info?

Free GoGrid Server TrialBy Anonymous on August 18, 2008, 11:01 pmGoGrid is offering free $100 trials with promo code 'GGED'. they offer Windows 2008 which is more than I can say with EC2

Reply | Read entire comment

good griefBy Anonymous on July 29, 2008, 11:14 amso you antiques like slow performance with no vision for improvement... clever

Reply | Read entire comment

Here, Here!By Anon on June 29, 2008, 10:36 pmWell, fancy pants C64 dude, in MY company, we use a Commodore Pet using the Pet-a-Linux distro to do all our heavy lifting. In fact, my IT Director got a hernia...

Reply | Read entire comment

Upgrade - SmupgradeBy Anonymous on June 9, 2008, 3:16 pmWe are using the Commodore 64 here at my company and I agree - upgrades are only for those who want to play that game. Guess what - We do not have any Anti-Virus...

Reply | Read entire comment

2008 ServerBy Anonymous on March 3, 2008, 10:04 amwho cares, more junk in the trunk. Like Vista nobody needs it just those who want to play the " lets upgrade game ". We will live without it and the next one too.

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed
Get instant email notification when white papers, webcasts, executive guides are added to our library. Stay informed and up-to-date with the latest on IT Technologies with Network World's Resource Alerts.